Come on, give us a song

January 6th, 2009

Whenever you wake in an armchair and find the television still on, one of the nightmare experiences is finding yourself watching one of the shows set in a summer camp. Your timing is impeccable. One of those perky leaders has everyone sitting expectantly round a camp fire and she calls for a song. OK, so how many times has that happened to you? Right! It’s pure fantasy for something I’m writing on Halloween. But I did come across a very rare event reported in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and, as a collector of weird trivia, I’m passing it on to you. Tramadol hcl has fewer side effects than the other painkillers. None of the possible interactions affect him. But when the hospital decide to introduce tramadol hcl, he began to hear someone singing. This was distressing to a man of his age. He thought his mind had finally given up and he was demented. When the tramadol hcl was withdrawn, the music faded and was gone after two days. Musical hallucinations are not uncommon in the elderly, more usually affecting women, the depressed and those with hearing difficulties. But, this is the first time that we have a verified auditory hallucination caused by tramadol hcl. So, to the usual list of side effects of drowsiness, dizziness, sweating, nausea and physical trembling, we can now add the incredibly rare possibility of you suddenly hearing a group of teenagers bursting into song around a campfire. If this should happen to you, do not panic.

Slow and steady wins the race

January 6th, 2009

A few months ago, there was an interesting piece of research published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Before I start to explain the research, I should make it clear that it’s not a full scientific study. Most people who want to lose weight play around with their diet, talk about exercising and buy phentermine to use as an appetite suppressants. The combination of diet and a weight loss medication will, over time, reduce those pounds. All it takes is the self-discipline to stick to the diet.

When you were young, you probably remember your mother telling you to eat more slowly. In my family, there were standing jokes about how many times you were supposed to chew each mouthful before swallowing it. We agreed a different number of chews depending on whether it was toast in the morning or meat for dinner. But it now seems we were ahead of our time - unscientifically speaking. The most recent research was carried out by the University of Rhode Island. On two separate occasions, it invited thirty young people who notoriously eat large quantities, and gave them a meal of pasta, cheese and tomatoes. On the first occasion, they were asked to eat the meal as quickly as they could. On the second occasion, the participants were encouraged to socialize as much as possible during the meal and to eat slowly.

Although they were not given an actual number of chews for each mouthful, they were told to make sure that the food was thoroughly chewed before they swallowed it. The results of this experiment showed that the participants ate an average of seventy fewer calories when they ate slowly. When you buy phentermine, it works by using the brain’s messaging system to send a signal that the stomach is full. People stop eating when they feel full. Without the aid of phentermine, it takes about thirty minutes for the stomach to send that message to the brain indicating fullness. The natural process relies on physical changes to the stomach which distends as food enters and the release of appetite-related hormones. This new research confirms the theory that the more time you give yourself for the natural system to work, they less you will eat. The researchers also speculate that the more you savor and enjoy the food, the more you will be satisfied by eating fewer calories. If the natural approach takes too long to work, there’s always phentermine to fall back on.

The answer, my friend, is in the genes

November 19th, 2008

There’s a most curious trend in science that has been significantly affecting the way we all think about the world. When I was young, people slaved away in laboratories and, when they came up with a chemical analysis, they would proudly talk in terms of 1 part per 100. Now, they apply a version of Moore’s Law, and seem worried that they are only able to measure in so few parts per tens of million. As a result, we now worry about contamination in food because it contains 1 part per million of some potentially dangerous pollutant. We also seem to believe that, once we have cracked the genetic code, we will be able to cure all ills through gene splicing.

The researchers are like a posse in the Wild West, out to track down the bad guys responsible for robbing men of their hair. So let’s just imagine for a moment what this discovery means. You could test your baby boy on birth and, if it lacks the relevant genes, you could start the grieving process early. Perhaps you should buy stock in Merck & Co., the pharmaceutical company that makes propecia. That way, when your offspring is old enough to give it business, you can get a dividend. I should make it clear that propecia is the best drug to treat male pattern baldness.

Needless to say, it adversely affects women. So until these clever researchers (mostly men) find the way to turn off the switch that triggers male baldness, you will just have to rely on propecia. Before I go, I should make a slightly more serious point. The way in which genes interact to produce a physical result is extremely complicated. Under normal circumstances, I would deeply resent diverting valuable research time to a cosmetic condition.

However, this research may also help those who are deaf. The reason why people lose their hearing is because they are unable to replace the hair cells inside the ear that help to transmit the sounds. Unfortunately, propecia has no effect in slowing down the loss of hearing. So there is a genuinely serious condition that may be cured if this research does discover why all humans lose their hair (both on the head and inside the ear).

What do you fear?

October 4th, 2008

Perhaps you were in scary accident and injured your body or you have a disease that makes it painful to move. Let’s work through the mental process. Pain is the body’s way of telling you that, if you carry on moving, you’re going to make the injury or damage worse. Well, if pain is a warning signal, you’d better heed the warning and stop moving. Human nature is very predictable. People who are injured or have a condition like arthritis grow afraid to move. They fear that any movement will cause them pain. They prefer to avoid the pain so become increasingly static. Actually, if you never moved at all (except to breathe and eliminate wastes) you could probably do without the online Ultram stores altogether. As it is, taking the painkiller is a good preventative measure. Well, this is the way to end up an invalid. You need a combination of psychological and physical therapy to unlearn the fear response. Life must go on. Maybe there are new limits requiring adjustments. But you cannot give in to this fear. It is still possible to move. You just need someone to show you how to move with less pain. Yes, Ultram is useful while you experiment. But as your confidence reasserts itself, you should slowly use the painkiller less. You will not make any kind of recovery if you become dependent on painkillers. Now that really is something worth fearing!

When patience isn’t enough

October 4th, 2008

As a child, you fell down and learned all about pain. For the most part, it passed quickly. This gave you confidence to keep on learning to walk or to ride that bicycle. But all bets are off once the doctor tells you the pain is chronic, i.e. it will be with you for months or years. Even though the actual level of pain may be exactly the same as you felt when recovering from the accident, your anger or despair magnify it. Patient acceptance disappears and your mood shades toward a depression. As an adult, if you get in an accident or have short-term pain, you know it will only take a week or so for the wounds to heal and then you can get on with your life as if nothing had happened. This makes the pain easier to bear. You simply take a painkiller like Ultram and wait to get better. Even if bones are fractured so recovery will take longer, most cope well. Absense of movements leads to an increase in weight, insomnia appears and stress builds. Any pain is considered bad and many abuse Ultram and other painkillers by taking excessive amounts. You must break this cycle into depression and achieve a more positive world outlook. Accepting the pain and working round it is a necessary step to getting on with your life. Any other course leaves you a victim to your own despair.

Did something slip my mind?

September 26th, 2008

Well, guess what. The next time you buy your Viagra, the labeling is going to warn you there’s a risk you won’t remember something important. So, like you’re lying there in bed next to this beautiful woman and want to go again (that Viagra’s really got you in the mood). What’s your best line? Well, you could always try, “Are you ready to go for the first touch down?” “The first?” she queries. “Well, I can’t remember anything after getting into bed!”

After all, if you take a pill of viagra, you don’t want to see a second head sprouting from your neck three or four days later. A second mouth to feed is just too much with the price of gas $4 a gallon and a recession threatening. Those folks down at the FDA are doing a wonderful job protecting us from all those side effects. So I was real surprised to see the FDA is getting all worked up about TGA.

Hey, that doesn’t read so good. She’s going to be real pissed at you if you say you can’t remember the last five times. What was she doing to please you so much? Now I understand why the FDA is so worried about this TGA. It could get real dangerous in bed if you can’t remember having sex with your partner.

The tendency to develop diabetes in depressed patients isn’t connected with the particular medicine they take.

September 26th, 2008

It doesn’t matter how well balanced and scientifically neutral the source material may be, news are often much more sensational than you can suppose. Only bad news is good news to sell newspapers and keep the advertisers happy. It is always fascinating to watch how the media pick up on a story from the world of medical research. So, as responsible journalists, how should we approach an article in the January edition of Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice? Well, I jest, of course. Actually approaching it in the first place is difficult because this is hardly a hot-from-the-presses must-read magazine. You actually have to be searching for research with a magnifying glass. Brown, Mujumdar and Johnson had the data on the incidence of type 2 diabetes from 1st January, 1991 to 31st December, 2001 among patients who were depressed. Anyway, the authors beat the grasses with a stick in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan to see what snakes would come out. The majority were taking either or both a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) like Zoloft or a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) like Aventyl or Elavil.

I can already feel the headlines bubbling up: Living is Saskatchewan is dangerous to your health! Zoloft ate my hamster and got diabetes (a reference to the Evil Emperor Zoloft who rules over the Milky Way except our bit and deserves to suffer retribution for all his evil doings). The TCAs were first used in the 1950s but, as the newer medications including the SSRIs have come on to the markets, the TCAs have been increasingly phased out because they are considered more likely to cause side effects. Thus, in the period covered by the research, it would not be surprising that patients should be taking both. Either they would be phasing out, say, Moxdil in favor of the newer Zoloft or they were adopting a belt-and-braces approach and combining the old with the new, hoping for the best result. Today, it should be quite unusual to find a significant number of people taking Zoloft and one of the TCAs. But, if you are one of these people, you should stop taking the TCA right now. So let us be absolutely clear on the message here. There is no link in this research between Zoloft and diabetes. Indeed, in the literature, there is a considerable body of evidence to show that the link is more certainly between a depressive illness and diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, etc. The reason is scientific confirmation of a common sense or intuitive truth. That people who are depressed do not look after themselves with the same care and attention as “healthy” people.

Xanax details

September 24th, 2008

Xanax is a prescription pill given to you by your doctor for the treatment of anxiety and the subsequent disorders of anxiety. While the sufferer may be feeling fear for nothing at all, the perceived danger is extremely real to the person experiencing it. Because of this, anxiety is a disorder that should always be taken seriously, especially if the sufferer has any family history of mental illness or other disorders.

With the help of your family physician, you can learn to live your life without worry or anxiety. With the help of Xanax you can slowly become less inclined to having attacks. Soon, you will be able to understand the way your body reacts to crowds, people, places, and anything unfamiliar so that you can take the doses as needed or properly as prescribed by your doctor.

Xanax is prescribed to mainly treat any form of anxiety. This may include the treatment of panic attacks and irritable bowel syndrome. Your doctor will be able to determine what your needs are and prescribe you the doses accordingly. You can also take Xanax for extreme anxiety disorders which may include agoraphobia. Be sure to follow the doctor’s prescriptions exactly as they are ordered so that you do not suffer the more extreme cases of withdrawal.
Overdosing on Xanax is possible if you are not careful and if you think an overdose has occurred, call your emergency doctor immediately. Start slowly with cheap Xanax online and see how you feel. Once you have been able to reap the benefits of this medication, you will be able to live life again.

Prostate surgery or treatment with Levira?

September 15th, 2008

This August has seen an interesting recommendation from the US Preventative Services Task Force. Men aged more than 75 years should not be screened for prostate cancer. Indeed, younger men should be counseled on whether screening is necessary or desirable. Why should the medical profession, which is supposed to be there to save lives, be leaving older men out of the diagnosis and treatment loop? Well, it’s not quite as heartless as it might appear. Prostate cancer grows quite slowly and men are likely to die of old age before the cancer kills them. Indeed, if men are diagnosed with cancer, this is distressing. The men and their families obviously worry. The Task Force argues it is better not to know. If men do begin to have problems with erectile dysfunction, they can simply take Levitra which almost inevitably allows sexual activity to resume. Taking biopsies is invasive and can be painful. Some of the medications treatment short of surgery can cause impotence. Surgery more often than not does cause sexual problems that Levitra can only partially solve. Thus, if there are no serious symptoms to investigate, it’s better not to look. Letting life take its course is the kindest option.

Killing is the only way to measure weight loss

September 2nd, 2008

Warning to all weight watchers. The Japanese have just published a scientific report in Polar Biology - another of those must-read journals. Kenji Konishi, who works out of the Institute of Cetacean Research in Tokyo, said August 27 that killing was the only way to accurately measure factors such as body weight or fat thickness! So if you’re holidaying in the polar regions this Fall and see a Japanese researcher coming towards you with one of those big samurai swords, you may decide that you don’t want to be a part of the research. Except that he’s talking about Antarctic minke whales. OK, so when did you last see a minke whale on your bathroom weighing scales? He’s got a point. It’s hard to get a whale to stay still long enough to get an accurate reading. And then there are those caliper things, the “fat pinchers”. Where would you get pinchers big enough? Seems hard to have to kill them to find out whether their diets are working. How would you like it in a clinical trial? Take these Acomplia tablets for six months and then we’ll kill you to find out how much adipose fat you’ve lost. Can’t they just guess? Actually, when it comes to human clinical trials, they use advanced science like tape measures for waists. Acomplia has done well. Participants lose an average 10% of their body weight and an average 3 inches (8 cm) from their waists. Perhaps the minke whales are buying Acomplia online. Let’s not kill them to find out.